<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jumping Spider, but which one???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/09/18/jumping-spider-but-which-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/09/18/jumping-spider-but-which-one/</link>
	<description>Are we experts yet?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lmreid71</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/09/18/jumping-spider-but-which-one/comment-page-1/#comment-52834</link>
		<dc:creator>lmreid71</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 02:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsthatbug.com/?p=20816#comment-52834</guid>
		<description>My son found one of these this afternoon :)  They&#039;re so cute!  I plan on trying to get a photo tomorrow.  Thanks for all the great information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son found one of these this afternoon <img src='http://www.whatsthatbug.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   They&#8217;re so cute!  I plan on trying to get a photo tomorrow.  Thanks for all the great information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel_R</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/09/18/jumping-spider-but-which-one/comment-page-1/#comment-52293</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel_R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsthatbug.com/?p=20816#comment-52293</guid>
		<description>My son and I just found a spider EXACTLY like the one posted above. It was climbing up the side of my house (outside). We are happy to know that it is not dangerous. We live in Kansas, so they are not just found in OK. We lost it before we could take a picture to send in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son and I just found a spider EXACTLY like the one posted above. It was climbing up the side of my house (outside). We are happy to know that it is not dangerous. We live in Kansas, so they are not just found in OK. We lost it before we could take a picture to send in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kkroeker</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/09/18/jumping-spider-but-which-one/comment-page-1/#comment-15795</link>
		<dc:creator>kkroeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsthatbug.com/?p=20816#comment-15795</guid>
		<description>Hi J. Hopkins:

Please don’t underestimate yourself, or overestimate some of the ‘expert’ commentary on this site. Although there definitely are a number of experts that contribute regularly to this site, I am by no means one of them, certainly not when it comes to spiders anyway. What I have always liked about this site is that it encourages people to not only appreciate the bugs around them, but to learn more about them, and to pitch in when others have a question. We can all become ‘experts’ if work at it enough. You are the one who saw the spider and it appears you have done your homework, so go with your instincts. 

I should have added P. apacheanus (and perhaps others) to my short list of possibilities, but I missed it and you didn’t. Identifying an insect or a spider from a photo is very often tricky, more so when you have to rely on other photos to do so. That’s why I seldom offer a definitive answer and I always look for several sources before I offer an identification for a creature that falls outside my comfort zone (in this case I probably came off sounding more confident than I really was). I completely agree with the point you make in your last post; the internet is a fantastic resource but mistakes do get made. Regarding your spider, your photo was a bit fuzzy and didn’t show all the features that could be relevant to making an identification (one photo seldom does), so you may never get an absolute answer unless you get some more photos or get a opportunity to examine a specimen more closely. In the meantime, go with your answer, it sounds pretty good to me. I really appreciate your effort and follow-up comments – my own education continues. Regards.  K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi J. Hopkins:</p>
<p>Please don’t underestimate yourself, or overestimate some of the ‘expert’ commentary on this site. Although there definitely are a number of experts that contribute regularly to this site, I am by no means one of them, certainly not when it comes to spiders anyway. What I have always liked about this site is that it encourages people to not only appreciate the bugs around them, but to learn more about them, and to pitch in when others have a question. We can all become ‘experts’ if work at it enough. You are the one who saw the spider and it appears you have done your homework, so go with your instincts. </p>
<p>I should have added P. apacheanus (and perhaps others) to my short list of possibilities, but I missed it and you didn’t. Identifying an insect or a spider from a photo is very often tricky, more so when you have to rely on other photos to do so. That’s why I seldom offer a definitive answer and I always look for several sources before I offer an identification for a creature that falls outside my comfort zone (in this case I probably came off sounding more confident than I really was). I completely agree with the point you make in your last post; the internet is a fantastic resource but mistakes do get made. Regarding your spider, your photo was a bit fuzzy and didn’t show all the features that could be relevant to making an identification (one photo seldom does), so you may never get an absolute answer unless you get some more photos or get a opportunity to examine a specimen more closely. In the meantime, go with your answer, it sounds pretty good to me. I really appreciate your effort and follow-up comments – my own education continues. Regards.  K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bugman</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/09/18/jumping-spider-but-which-one/comment-page-1/#comment-15775</link>
		<dc:creator>bugman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsthatbug.com/?p=20816#comment-15775</guid>
		<description>The genus Phidippus was our original suspicion, but we hadn&#039;t the time to research this more closely yesterday.  The photo that you have linked to looks quite close, but sadly, the image that was sent to us is lacking in clear details, so exact identification might not be possible.  Even the specimen on BugGuide does not have an exact species identification.  Many members of the genus Phidippus are variable in coloration.  It is possible that J&#039;s uncle was trying to identify a previously unidentified species or subspecies, but whether or not the proper protocol for new species recording occurred fifty years ago is not known.  More carefully sifting through the images on BugGuide might actually reveal some answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The genus Phidippus was our original suspicion, but we hadn&#8217;t the time to research this more closely yesterday.  The photo that you have linked to looks quite close, but sadly, the image that was sent to us is lacking in clear details, so exact identification might not be possible.  Even the specimen on BugGuide does not have an exact species identification.  Many members of the genus Phidippus are variable in coloration.  It is possible that J&#8217;s uncle was trying to identify a previously unidentified species or subspecies, but whether or not the proper protocol for new species recording occurred fifty years ago is not known.  More carefully sifting through the images on BugGuide might actually reveal some answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lttlechkn</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/09/18/jumping-spider-but-which-one/comment-page-1/#comment-15773</link>
		<dc:creator>lttlechkn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 04:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsthatbug.com/?p=20816#comment-15773</guid>
		<description>Following your idea that this jumping spider is of the subfaily Dendryphantinae... could this little guy/gal be of the Genus Phidippus? I think this could be a match for the picture posted http://bugguide.net/node/view/334464/bgimage</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following your idea that this jumping spider is of the subfaily Dendryphantinae&#8230; could this little guy/gal be of the Genus Phidippus? I think this could be a match for the picture posted <a href="http://bugguide.net/node/view/334464/bgimage" rel="nofollow">http://bugguide.net/node/view/334464/bgimage</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 378/379 objects using memcached

Served from: www.whatsthatbug.com @ 2012-02-10 19:00:12 -->
