<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spined Oak Borer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/07/13/spined-oak-borer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/07/13/spined-oak-borer/</link>
	<description>Are we experts yet?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spined Oak Borer, not Banded Hickory Borer. Or possibly Parelaphidion aspersum??? &#124; What's That Bug?</title>
		<link>http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2009/07/13/spined-oak-borer/comment-page-1/#comment-39752</link>
		<dc:creator>Spined Oak Borer, not Banded Hickory Borer. Or possibly Parelaphidion aspersum??? &#124; What's That Bug?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whatsthatbug.com/?p=17190#comment-39752</guid>
		<description>[...] of Karl June 3, 2010 Hi Daniel: This is a confusing one. It looks a lot like a cerambycid that was posted previously on WTB and identified as a Spined Oak Borer (Elaphidion mucranatum; Cerambycinae: Elaphidiini). You can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of Karl June 3, 2010 Hi Daniel: This is a confusing one. It looks a lot like a cerambycid that was posted previously on WTB and identified as a Spined Oak Borer (Elaphidion mucranatum; Cerambycinae: Elaphidiini). You can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using memcached
Object Caching 313/314 objects using memcached

Served from: www.whatsthatbug.com @ 2012-02-10 14:43:14 -->
